Recently Thomas Dullien wrote a blogpost asking what the OS of the future really looks like, considering the computer of the future is a distributed mega-engine. I would, annoyingly, posit that the algorithms that make sense to understand in that world are those already implemented in the many species of social insects.

In that sense, I think there are things missing from his list of the basics of what a datacenter computer contains. At some level, I think the right set of algorithmic support will undergo phase changes as you scale up, but still be viable at small scales: (see this new paper for a detailed example: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.20.259614v1) 

I will include Thomas's list below:

I would say some level of ID is missing - large-colony ants have Caste systems for a reason. I think people in general ignore ID because maybe you can make ID and security a micro-service on top of a pub/sub message queuing system? I'm not sure. But in general, the same thing is true for most security analysis systems sold today - they see an infection, they treat a computer/network as infected and respond appropriately.

At Immunity/AppGate we've been trying to go the other direction - tying your security directly to your identity. AppGate SDP already does this for network services, but we've also expanded upon that by using a graph database, INNUENDO Agent, a custom Windows Kernel module, and a lot of other excitement to build automated response that looks at your ID as much as it does your computer: 

CONSTELLATION + AppGate SDP (3m)

CONSTELLATION vs. Ransomware (9m)

CONSTELLATION vs. Robbinhood (11m)

-dave